Liquid Talks

Introducing the first in a series of “Liquid Talks”. The first talks will begin on the first Friday of June, leading up and following on from the forthcoming TEDx talks at the Houses of Parliament. Our aim is to cover a number of key software projects, and real world pilots. So if you have a project please get in touch. Today we start with Vilfredo.

Vilfredo: Part 1

Pietro Speroni presenting Vilfredo at the Hub Westminster.

Introducing Hub Democracy: Liquid Feedback

A brief introduction by Alice Fung, of the Hub Network of co-working spaces, and the problems the association has with it’s decision making, and hence why it is looking to trial Liquid Feedback open source software to help with these.

Vilfredo Part 2

A description of Vilfredo from the more metaphorical perspective of a moderator who does not understand the subject being debated, perhaps not even understanding the language being spoken.

Lobbi: a brief introduction

A very quick informal introduction of Lobbi.org by Hussain Shafiei.

We will be editing these talks, and presenting it more professionally for later consumption.

Parliament of Food

Today we are introducing a new project in which we hope to explore a number of the topics raised in this blog. The Food Parliament is democratic experiment in which we look to give political voice to stuff. The stuff in question is of course food.

Food is not just a topic of conversation, it is a format. Much of human culture is based around food, it’s preparation, production, and then of course the meal itself. Conversations happen around this table, decisions are made over dinner, and every meal table has the necessary ingredients required for a future parliament. Or is it missing something?

  • Farmtable banquet
  • Global Feast - An Ol
  • Tarpon feast by Elle
  • feast
  • Beautiful Vegetable
  • Banquet
  • Bear Feast
  • Farmtable banquet
  • ✯ Long Street Banque
  • Khrushchev banquet

A core question the project raises is the idea that it is possible to give democratic representation to objects. This is a practical, as well as a theoretical question. The environment and issues such as global warming clearly require action, and action in democratic societies requires democratic debate, political decision making, and eventually legislation. We therefore already include a range of voices, from scientists, to lobby groups in this process. The question raised here is not therefore as simple as can, or should we do this, but rather is there a better way of doing this?

It can be argued of course that people in the end must decide, and all this talk of “giving voice” to inanimate objects in the political process, is nothing more than mumbo-jumbo. Does it make sense to really try and give an ingredient a “voice”. What are the dangers, and absurdities for instance, of inviting people to speak for on behalf of this plant?

 

Through a series of events – events we are dubbing “collisions” – we will will seek answers to this question. Can we make any sense of this attempt to represent a plant, or food-stuff? Can we speak for things? The methodology is simple enough – let’s ask the question and see what people come up with? Meal time discussions will be used to record and archive the conversations, and we will be teaming up with the Festival of Mint, and FOG.FM to celebrate local food production, and give these discussions a focus.

Subscribe / stay tuned to this blog to follow the progress of this event, or send us an email at food@parliamentofthings.org. To take part in this event wherever you are, all you need to do is:

  1. Cook a meal at home with locally produced produce
  2. Invite friends
  3. Tune into FOG.FM and listen to the radio
  4. Put your event on the map

If a you feel more ambitious then consider inviting members of the public and create a “supper club” event, or perhaps hold a talk or discussion. For the more creatively inclined you could participate in the radio station by contributing play lists, take a turn as a DJ, or invite live performers for a session on the radio.

Finally, we fully expect some events may be in public venues, cafés, or turn into complete local festivals of their own. That’s what we did in Finsbury Park, London last year, and it was a hoot. Look forward to meeting more lovely people this year. Why not put your town on the map?

Towards Open and Innovative Governance

Just been watching an excellent conference on Open and Innovative Governance.

Dazza Greenwood (@dazzagreenwood) was particularly good on his emphasis on flexible identities – but in general a wealth of great speakers and examples of projects. Check the video archive here.

Flavours of Money

Most people view money as a neutral store of value. They are wrong. There are flavours of money – inherent emergent value systems that are built into the design of the currency. Here we have Bernard Lietaer talking about the design of our current financial system in terms of Yin and Yang.

Lietaer is no light-weight. His CV includes a phD at MIT, and a stint at the Central Bank in Belgium (National Bank of Belgium), where he implemented the convergence mechanism (ECU) to the single European currency system. During that period, he also served as President of Belgium’s Electronic Payment System. Business Week named him “the world’s top currency trader” in 1992. You can check his bio on WikiPedia or here.

Flavours of Money
It is our view that money and votes are just two examples of token exchange games, from a palette of an infinitely more diverse range of similar games. The design of these games, profoundly influences the behaviour of players – games can be individualistic or cooperative, thoughtful or aggressive. Democratic votes, differ from hard currency in only a few minor technical aspects, a fact that you can discover for yourself if you try and code computer systems for online voting or currency transactions – yet we treat them very differently. Liquid Democracy allows votes to flow more freely through the network, and can itself be broken down into different categories of votes or recommendations – reflecting different value systems. Ricardian Contracts can be used to assign entirely new forms of value to conventional currency systems.

 

This is not complex stuff, this is not 3D computer graphics, or rocket science – just simple game design. There are many different flavours of money, and we do not have to be stuck with the one we’ve got.

Space

The Parliament of Things is a decision making space, in which various stakeholders to a decision, come together (that is interact), in order to reach a decision. This space is better if it is represented in physical space in some form or other, but this does not necessarily mean a “parliament” in the traditional sense, rather it may mean a network of smaller spaces, temporary spaces, public or intimate spaces, that are combined somehow into a single cohesive decision making sense through the medium of the network.

The medium of the network is deliberately vague here. Yes, an obvious way to conceive of such a network of spaces is to use technology, the internet, video conferencing, projection, and software platforms to connect these spaces, but this is not the only way, and indeed high-tech real-time conferencing rarely works well, and is for the present a technology that would exclude rather than include the vast majority of communities in the developed and the developing world. Better, is that we consider, other modes of connectivity, using story telling, recordings, asynchronous communication, SMS, and other low-tech solutions.

“Things” are spacial, decisions are usually multidimensional and can be restricted to specific domains. It is useful, to represent these processes spatially, if only as a metaphor that makes the way we debate issues more intuitive.

Theatre

So what is the “interface” that best combines the ideas of live (as in alive), and space (both as in physical space and narrative space)? And what human activity is closest to the aspirations and practice of our original experience of democracy? Theatre!

It is surely no accident that the ancient and original sites of democratic debate were also those of theatre. Even today, should you chance on a live community debate on a matter of importance, you will experience first hand, the vitality of real human theatre. For my part this was what drew me first to the political sphere, having absolutely no interest in national party political politics.

Our second inspiration comes from the life long work of Augusto Boal, who sadly passed away in 2009. His work first in Forum Theatre and then finally with Legislative Theatre was always political (in it’s best sense), but never dull.

Brazilian theater director and writer Augusto Boal presenting his Theater of the Oppressed at Riverside Church in New York City.

Theatre in this physical space, political sense, is the ideal interface to Latour’s Parliament of things in the epistemological sense. Theatre is spatial, embedded .  The set of a theatre can incorporate, projection, video, sound, lighting – it is an informational space. It provides context to the debate.

Interactive, or improvised theatre, is also a debate, but more than a debate in the political sense, it captures potent ideas around the notions of expertise, skill, emotive communication, authenticity participation and engagement. It is controversial and playful. It is serious and informative. In the sense of theatrical space, the performance interface is the legal framework of the parliament. It is the written, spoken and unspoken culture of interaction in the space.